The Stanford Daily

Opinions





Comments about "Editorial: A de-lightful solution"


<< Back to Editorial: A de-lightful solution

8 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive Marvin L Foushee on 3/07/08 at 5am

You should wrap up your words with more explosion and a death shroud to make your attack against the Michael Lucas moths coming out of the Judeo-Fascist Hoover Institute more FBI convincing.

Report as: spam offensive K on 3/08/08 at 11am

Fantastic editorial, edit board! Well-reasoned and about an interesting and relevant topic that most of us know little about. Well done.

Report as: spam offensive Second K on 3/08/08 at 6pm

What a great article!! I wish the administration reads and discuss it.

Report as: spam offensive Concerned on 3/08/08 at 9pm

Thanks Daily for brining this important issue to the attention of the Student Body. I was very concerned about the Moths and their possible link to light pollution...just needed to see the Editorial Board of our campus newspaper bring it up out of thin air before I realized it.

Report as: spam offensive KW on 3/09/08 at 12am

wow, this actually sounds like an original, potentially effective proposal that i've never heard before at stanford. great job editorial board!

Report as: spam offensive Caterpillar Jim on 3/09/08 at 11pm

Whatever gets those damn caterpillars off the trees, man.

Report as: spam offensive WR on 3/11/08 at 8am

This editorial is an encouraging sign that the editorial board can bring to light issues that actually impact the Stanford community.

Report as: spam offensive PF on 3/11/08 at 6pm

Great editorial - we at Kingscote Gardens recently had to go out and buy light blocking window shades after the university put in bright lights in many cases only a few feet from the building. Having safe walking paths at night doesn't meet you have to place such high intensity lights which waste energy and attract insects. In addition, several studies recently have suggested that high night time ambient light levels alerts the body's hormone cycles, perhaps explaining the increased risk of cancer and chronic disease in person exposed to high level of ambient light during what used to be the night.




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)