The Stanford Daily

Opinions





Comments about "Left Coast: Judging juries"


<< Back to Left Coast: Judging juries

5 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive cdizzle on 3/06/08 at 8am

i liked this article...I have been thinking for years that laws are an agreed upon form of democracy that has become overregulated to a fault. I can't say what the solution should be, but I agree there should be something done.

Report as: spam offensive Ted Rudow III,MA on 3/06/08 at 8am

The only way that the president can get a dictatorial control on the country is to get control of the Supreme Court. You see, it's supposed to be a balanced government: You know, the legislative branch, Congress; the judicial branch, the Court; and the executive branch, the President. If any two of those can get together, they can control the other. Well, it's not likely the Supreme Court and Congress are going to make a dictator because there are plenty of both of them. It's not likely that the President is going to be able to control the Congress too well and become a dictatorship. But, if he can get control of five men!--In order to become a dictator in the United States, you only have to control five men.
There have been several men who have had that kind of majority to work with, but they were benign Presidents. They were good men who were trying to do the country good and they weren't trying to be a dictator. But there have been two men in American history, both of whom wanted to be dictators and they wanted to get control of the country, and they did it the same way.
I have the feeling that Bush is one of the ones who want to be King! A ruler and leader gets a little puffed up in his head and begins to think he's really a god. God won't stand for it.
Ted Rudow III,MA

Report as: spam offensive OJ on 3/06/08 at 2pm

they jury system worked for me

Report as: spam offensive The Truf on 3/06/08 at 11pm

I like the sentiment of the column. But then I realize that all these Kafka-esque legal conundra come from lawyers. Then I remember that lawyers as a whole are in big with the Democratic Party, and the and Kai is in deep with the Democratic Party...but the lawyers have way more money and interest in a flawed legal system, which makes me think that unfortunately when the chips are down Kai's voice will go unheard. I mean the Obama campaign has gotta get paid somehow, doesn't it?

Report as: spam offensive kai on 3/18/08 at 10am

This "too many laws" point is made excellently in:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/03/15/spitzers_legal_minefield/
by the way.




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)