The Stanford Daily

Sports



http://www.conocophillips.com/energyprize

Comments about "Column: Foul play"


<< Back to Column: Foul play

6 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive Cardinal Fan on 3/12/08 at 1pm

stop whining. No one liked the call; it was obviously bad. The choke the next day at USC didn't help.

Report as: spam offensive SportsFan on 3/12/08 at 8pm

Anyone with half a brain knew they wouldn't win against USC after getting completely fucked against UCLA. You think the team was in a good mental state, Cardinal Fan? Absolutely not.

Report as: spam offensive Andrew on 3/15/08 at 8pm

I am a long time Bruin fan and was impressed by how the Cardinal and Bears responded to the difficult calls. All I have to say is "ow do you like us now?" Both Stanford and California had to wait about a week to exact their revenge on a neutral court and both came up short!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report as: spam offensive Andrew on 3/15/08 at 8pm

I am a long time Bruin fan and was impressed by how the Cardinal and Bears responded to the difficult calls. All I have to say is "how do you like us now?" Both Stanford and California had to wait about a week to exact their revenge on a neutral court and both came up short!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report as: spam offensive Andrew on 3/15/08 at 8pm

Best of luck to all the Pac-10 teams that make it to the Big Dance!!!!!!

Report as: spam offensive Re: Andrew on 3/15/08 at 11pm

Both came up short, but at least the reffing was fine (or actually, was shitty for both teams). I don't think anyone would say that Stanford or Berkeley are better teams than UCLA. But they should have won those two games, and UCLA's wins in the tourney doesn't change that.




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)