I can bet dollars to donuts that in this professor's commentary on Lincoln, he neglects to mention that, as a Republican, his party saw to it that slavery in America
came to an end. According, to a Democrat's book, written by William Gibbs McAdoo, it was Lincoln's ideas which were responsible for Socical Security and the Federal Reserve. Then again, I am starting to wonder with the murder of an origional actor, for a lasting copy of his work which elevated gays to an alltime new high, as his death will be forever marred by uncertainty, but then again, so is Lincoln's! Where in all of Stanford's bibliographical collection is there even mention Lincoln was born in North Carolina, and his real father's last name is Enloe? Then again, why speak of blacks, yet not connect them back to those exterminated in Europe 654 years ago? Stanford's history professor seems to have joined a Modesto Bee journalist who wrote the truth about the Modocs War of Stanislaus county. The only thing that reporter left out of his book is that Estanislau was a Flathead from Oregon who was baptised in San Jose, as he revolted mission life, and went to Modesto to give the black Chistians there an ultimatum- reject God: get pimped or die? They, like every branch of Native America's SuperFamily in California were exterminated, so their Chistian cross might be used when the Russian Orthodox Church was stolen from Christians
and given by Lenin to the godless USSR who then began to murder Christians in Eastern Europe. Hey, you got any books connection Stanford to this?

Should you really use the term "dead at 73" as the headline? Isn't that kind of disrespectful? How about "History Professor Passes Away" or something like that.