The Stanford Daily

News





Comments about "Bush condemns schools without ROTC programs"


<< Back to Bush condemns schools without ROTC programs

15 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive Alum '96 on 5/18/07 at 8am

As long as ROTC didn't require any university funding, they should be allowed to have a chapter on campus.

Report as: spam offensive 08 on 5/18/07 at 10am

The ROTC ban should stay. The organization doesn't support the fundamental standard; they discriminate against people because of their sexual discrimination. Which is disgusting.
No ROTC at Stanford!

Report as: spam offensive Vall on 5/18/07 at 11am

The military doesn't discriminate against anyone. They merely uphold the FEDERAL "don't ask, don't tell" law concering gays in the military, which was implemented under Clinton. These bans are about anti-military sentiment and nothing else. Too bad they will have the effect of creating the very elitism (i.e. only non-Ivy League college educated young people serving) in the military it's routinely accused of by its critics.

Report as: spam offensive SLS Alum '03 on 5/18/07 at 11am

'08, I think you meant to write "they discriminate against people because of their sexual orientation." I agree that don't ask, don't tell, is an unfair policy which is hurting our national security. Some highly respected former commanders and prominent politicians also believe this policy should be repealed. According to the latest polls, however, the majority of soldiers still favor it. The question then is whether barring ROTC from Stanford will hasten or delay the day that this most unfortunate legacy of the Clinton administration is repealed? I would be interested in reading a thoughtful analysis on this point, but my sense is that filling the ranks of the military with graduates of universities such as Stanford would be positive on many levels.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1598653,00.html


Report as: spam offensive Ugh on 5/19/07 at 2pm

anything to keep this war going, right?

Report as: spam offensive Bronco on 5/20/07 at 8am

It is upsetting and unfortunate to think that people associate ROTC on campus with the war in Iraq. There will always be a need for men and women to keep us safe while we sleep soundly at night , don't blame them for our current problems. The question is (as mentioned before): don't we want graduates from Stanford to be part of the military and to provide the military with the experiences and values that this university has given us?

Report as: spam offensive herb on 5/27/07 at 4pm

The Faculty Senate voted 38 to 6 On May 7, 1970, to end academic credit for ROTC courses effective August 31, 1970, because the courses did not meet the high standards of courses taught by faculty in Stanford departments, the courses were not open to all Stanford students, and the military (instead of Stanford) chose the faculty. President Kenneth Pitzer's Advisory Committee on ROTC Affairs then recommeded that the ROTC program be suspended and the Faculty Senate approved the committee's recommendation on June 4, 1970. The reasons for ending credit for ROTC courses have not changed in the past 37 years. Those who like to mention distinguished ROTC graduates forget that ROTC graduate Lt. William L. Calley, Jr., was convicted of the premeditated murder of 22 Vietnamese civilians in the March 16, 1968 My Lai masscre.

Report as: spam offensive Bronco on 5/27/07 at 10pm

Fact check: Calley wasn't in ROTC, he went through OCS.

Report as: spam offensive Wayne on 11/06/07 at 8am

The Military is racist, rough, and brainwashed. We do not
need this in our schools. Kids should be taught to think in
this world, not follow blindly some fool with a gun.

Report as: spam offensive Ron on 12/01/07 at 5pm

No way should rotc be allowed in schools. School is for learning how to get along and help people. Not for killing and destroying.

Report as: spam offensive SJ on 1/11/08 at 3pm

Then perhaps ROTC is a program that every school needs. As stated above, the program should not only be associated with war and violence. The skills taught in ROTC go beyond the battlefield. Cadets are taught how to be excellent leaders, patient followers and outstanding citizens of this country. Soldiers are willing to do as they do because of the loyalty they are taught to have for the civilians of this country, millions of civilians they will never meet. If that doesn't have anything to do with "getting along with people" then what does? Perhaps one should at least research the program or sit in on a military science class before making such ignorant closed minded comments about it.

You will be surprised to find out how many of your direct civilian leaders throughout your entire life will be military trained, most of which you will have high respect for because of the respect and loyalty they will give to you.

Report as: spam offensive Ron on 1/13/08 at 12pm

We dont need ROTC in our schools. School is to learn, not kill. Its time for militarism to be abolished in the world, with the US leading the way.
War is obsolete!!

Report as: spam offensive Nathan Leehe on 1/31/08 at 11am

For you idiots that believe that getting rid of ROTC is the correct decision, open your eyes before you open your mouth. I've been in the NJROTC program for 4 years now, and not ONCE have they said that it was okay to just grab a gun and kill people. It's not like that at all.

Think of it like this, there is a war that we are fighting, not because we felt like being ass holes and said, "Hey, let's screw up the Iraqi people because they're different." We were attacked, and we're making sure that they are contained. We are also helping govern their country, and of course, resistance will be met, but remember, WE NEVER SHOT FIRST.

The same concept in the ROTC program, we're not starting a war, we're not trying to force people into the military, we're not dictators trying to oppress you and your decision to try and "get rid of us." We are taking a leadership opportunity, and trying to make things better for ourselves, and most likely other people around us. Moreover, if there is any doubt in your mind about what you said, email me at slforce059@yahoo.com, I will always have an answer. (By the way, whenever someone first enters the program, I can be the first to say that they're not trying to recruit anyone. They may suggest it, but they'll never force you into doing something you don't want to do.)

Report as: spam offensive Nathan Leehe on 1/31/08 at 11am

Extra tidbit: Rifles are handled, but not at all enforced to be used as a weapon. We have a sport which is strictly enforced with rules and regulations to avoid any safety hazards. We drill with fake rifles that no one can handle except for drill team cadets to avoid any conflict. Even if the gun is fake and harmless, "Treat the gun as if it were always loaded." I highly doubt that anyone would be offended by that, especially if these rules are always strictly enforced.

www.fchs-njrotc.org

Come see our gallery sometime, you may be enlightened.

Report as: spam offensive Zach on 4/17/08 at 11am

Why the hell would Stanford be given the honor of having ROTC, fuck em




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)