The Stanford Daily

News





Comments about "Sweat-Free Campaign gets a revival"


<< Back to Sweat-Free Campaign gets a revival

7 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive Stanford Girl on 11/09/07 at 10am

Luis I don't really see the need to continue to foster these ideas of hostility around campus.. MEChA is an organization dedicated to building awareness for hispanic issues with the intention of bridging interests and collaborating with other organizations for the betterment of the community-- that is hardly racist

Report as: spam offensive Concerned on 11/09/07 at 10am

What a rude and offensive comment luis. I wish the "spam" or "offensive" buttons actually worked, or that the daily would leave up comments they disagreed with. I know my comment will be deleted by the end of the day, but I just had to put that out there.

Report as: spam offensive Did you even read the article? on 11/09/07 at 10am

Gee, it sure would be nice if the Sweat-Free Campaign did a better job of creating discussion on sweatshops at events where they, say, showed a documentary and maybe invited speakers who had an interesting perspective on the issue. Oh, wait...
It's fine and dandy to say you want to hear more perspectives on sweatshops, but you can't wait for them to invite speakers to your dorm room. You need to put a little effort into learning more if it's an issue you care about, otherwise I can't take seriously your complaint that Sweat-Free "seem[s] to like to pretend" to care more about the issue. If they're hosting events that you don't bother to attend, it's pretty clear that they *do* care more.
Finally, MEChA is not racist and I think the quote and perspective from their group is a very good addition to the article. If you'd like your opinion to be quoted, you probably need to show up to the event ;)

Report as: spam offensive Joe Mawma on 11/09/07 at 11am

Yeah luis, dumba$$...

Report as: spam offensive bb on 11/10/07 at 3am

Go Sweat-Free, Go!
Keep up the good work.

Report as: spam offensive john on 11/11/07 at 11pm

From an economic stand point, sweat shops are good for the people employed there given their job options are very limited. It's either take a low wage or get no wage. Efforts to eliminate sweat shops will just cause more of their workers to be unemployed, which makes them worse off than they are now.

Report as: spam offensive Student on 11/22/07 at 6pm

John,
Please read some of the information about the WRC and DSP on Sweatfree Stanford's website, at sweatfree.stanford.edu.
These organizations are seeking a solution to the problem of sweatshops that would not result in fewer jobs. In a nutshell, the idea is that companies like Nike facilitate upgrades to the conditions in the factories they already have contracts with, and keep contracts with these companies even though the labor will be slightly more expensive. (human rights does cost money sometimes...) Nike then absorbs this small cost, and the cost of apparel only rises a slight amount. All while allowing the workers to retain their jobs, just with better working conditions.




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)