The Stanford Daily

News





Comments about "Democracy for Muslims?"


<< Back to Democracy for Muslims?

13 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive Larry Yelowitz on 10/12/06 at 1pm

Former Malaysian Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim makes a number of valid and vital points, e.g., rejecting race- and religious-based affirmative action policies, claiming that Islam and democracy are compatible, and criticizing Muslims’ violent reactions to the Danish cartoons and the recent speech of Pope Benedict XVI.

He is off base, however, in his criticism of U.S. policy for refusing to negotiate with regimes like Hamas. The U.S. has decided, quite wisely, that our foreign policy is not to negotiate with terrorists. Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f requires the Department of State to provide an annual report to Congress on terrorism. The latest report, http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/45323.pdf, lists 40 terrorist entries, the majority of whom are radical Islamic terrorist groups, including Hamas and Hizbollah.

Using Hamas as an example, as did Mr. Ibrahim, it is obvious that its presence on this list of terrorist organizations is no fluke. Its charter states, "Israel will exist, and will continue to exist, until Islam abolishes it, as it abolished that which was before it.” Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal declared on Feb. 3, 2006, “Before Israel dies, it must be humiliated and degraded.” These chilling words have been supported by ongoing horrific acts of terrorism against innocent Israelis for many years. When Hamas is truly interested in recognizing the legitimacy of Israel’s existence, and renouncing its terrorist rhetoric and actions, then the U.S. government will be more than willing to negotiate with it.

Report as: spam offensive Sandran Balan on 10/12/06 at 11pm

Democracy should not be treated as an alien concept to Islam. The gods that created the birds to fly freely surely would not have wanted the humans to be shackled. But freedom is a relative thing. What value is freedom when you cannot walk down the neighbourhood without getting yourself killed? What value is freedom when people starve and children die of hunger? Americans do not practice what they preach. They do not recognize Hamas victory in the elections although Hamas was elected via democratic election.Democracy will not prosper if it is applied selectively.

Report as: spam offensive Malaysian on 10/15/06 at 10pm

Seems like the relationship between the Muslim world and the western world would be much better with more leaders such as Anwar Ibrahim. At least there would be more rational dialog.
However, I believe his comments can only be made in an environment such as in the United States. He already found out how poorly his views are tolerated in Malaysia. If he is indeed willing to contront extremist elements of the Muslim world as he stated in his speech, I believe he is in for a massive struggle.

Report as: spam offensive S.S.Raman Krishnan on 10/16/06 at 2am

Anwar sounds very idealistic. He should know better. In Malaysia, the race card is the easiest to play and most commonly used.Affirmative action that benefits the Malays is what is keeping UMNO alive. Take the NEP away, UMNO will collapse.

Report as: spam offensive Amin Ahmad on 10/16/06 at 11am

Miss Larry

If America doesn't want to negotiate with so called terrorist by America's own definition, how could you think that people want to negotiate with so called American and Israel as a real terrorist country which defined by them?

Report as: spam offensive From the Eyes of Baba on 11/07/06 at 10pm

Interesting speech by Anwar Ibrahim. Like any smart politicians, he knows fully well on how to grab the attention of the floor. Sometimes choosing a leader is akin to a game of chance - choose the lesser evil.
But the most fundamental problem arises when one country feels it is right in all ways or views and any other ways or views are wrong. Wrong by their definition.

Report as: spam offensive Max on 11/29/06 at 6pm

Mr. Anwar should play a more prominent role in Malaysia. Ruling party,UMNO, is a party of corrupt people out to make themselves rich while using race issues as their selling point. KEADILAN should be more aggressive in promoting its agenda before Malaysia goes bankrupt. Then, it would be like Afghanistan. The rich Chinese are already moving their investments overseas. History will repeat itself. UMNO will create chaos to make its existence relevent.

Report as: spam offensive LJ on 11/29/06 at 8pm

I was a supporter of the ruling party, BN in Malayisa for past 30 years, and I admit I made the biggest mistake in my life doing that. The next election, a lot of my friends including myself will vote for the Opposition.
Enough is enough !

Report as: spam offensive TJ on 11/29/06 at 8pm

The Ruling party might be corrupt but that doesn't mean the Opposition is better. The ruling party needs some reformation.

Report as: spam offensive YNC on 11/29/06 at 11pm

I may not support Anwar as a political returnee but I agree with his forward views on the abolishment of the NEP. However, I don't believe it will ever take place, not for the next 20 years. The special rights has become too entrenched in the mindset of the Malaysian Malays that they will not willingly surrender what is materially good although they may know in their heart it will not augur well for their race. It will take a long time to reverse the trend. Toppling the Barisan government is one way but for the immediate future is to cut back their majority to a razor thin level. For this the Malaysian opposition parties must come up with viable alternatives to a more discerning and educated voting population.

Report as: spam offensive Huang Siew Hock on 11/30/06 at 1am

Datuk Anwar Ibrahim, the former Deputy Prime Minister, had raised some interesting points.
He is right in stating that America should engage ina dialogue with HAMAS which won the majority of seats in the election. American democracy may not be the same as democracy in the Middle East. The fact, howeevr, remains that in the elction. Hamas obtained the majority. America should accept the fact that it won! You may not like the look of the organisation. But it is immaterial. Accept it!

Of course, Hamas had vowed to erase Israel from the map of the world! It is words only. Wait for the actions. Draw the line on the sand, if you like. America should accept Hamas as it is. But once it crosses the line and really brings destruction to Israel and her people, it is a different story and Hamas will have to pay a very heavy price for its destruction of another country. Then, America should be down the FULL FORCE of its military prowess on Hamas. Of cpurse, innocent lives will be lost in the cross-fire and amny NGOs and human righst5 activisst will cry FOUL and condemn America! Well, it is TOO late to condemn America. Has she not given notice that Hamas should not "cross the line" ?

This is a question of PRINCIPLE; it is a question of SINCERITY. If peopel start hitting belwo the belt, then they should pay the ultimate price. In the meantime, accept Hamas in good faith.

Terrorism is everywhere. But Muslims should NOT be condemned for all terrorist activities.

MO8

Report as: spam offensive Huang Siew Hock on 11/30/06 at 1am

Datuk Anwar Ibrahim, the former Deputy Prime Minister, had raised some interesting points.
He is right in stating that America should engage ina dialogue with HAMAS which won the majority of seats in the election. American democracy may not be the same as democracy in the Middle East. The fact, howeevr, remains that in the elction. Hamas obtained the majority. America should accept the fact that it won! You may not like the look of the organisation. But it is immaterial. Accept it!

Of course, Hamas had vowed to erase Israel from the map of the world! It is words only. Wait for the actions. Draw the line on the sand, if you like. America should accept Hamas as it is. But once it crosses the line and really brings destruction to Israel and her people, it is a different story and Hamas will have to pay a very heavy price for its destruction of another country. Then, America should be down the FULL FORCE of its military prowess on Hamas. Of cpurse, innocent lives will be lost in the cross-fire and amny NGOs and human righst5 activisst will cry FOUL and condemn America! Well, it is TOO late to condemn America. Has she not given notice that Hamas should not "cross the line" ?

This is a question of PRINCIPLE; it is a question of SINCERITY. If peopel start hitting belwo the belt, then they should pay the ultimate price. In the meantime, accept Hamas in good faith.

Terrorism is everywhere. But Muslims should NOT be condemned for all terrorist activities.

MO8

Report as: spam offensive Abdullah Abikar on 1/04/07 at 3pm

Anwar is a great man who needs the support of his people. for the Hamas issue, as he said, democracy is not to support America. If I don't agree with you, I'm a terrorist, right? I think itis the person who holds such mentality is the real terrorist and fanatic. Israel doesn't recognise the palestinians, that's why it occupies, so what is the point of recognising someone who does't beleive in your exsistence? Why are you occupying the land if you recognise them? Don't the palestinians have the right to elect whom they want? Must you love the person who comes to th helm? Thay's being terrorists. Democracy is not the Anglo-Saxon concept of purity, itis not sacrilege and insults. It is not slander and subjugation, itis not stealing other people's resources under the banner of freedom. Anwar, come back to politics and let's dislodge corrupt UMNO who thrive on divide and rule, duplicity and deceit. Howevere, everyone knows the Malays have every right to have some special rights, after all they have accepted others to join their nation, let's not be too niggrad and ambitious........




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)