The Stanford Daily

News





Comments about "Robot car to tackle city streets"


<< Back to Robot car to tackle city streets

10 Comments on this article:

Report as: spam offensive m on 10/11/06 at 4am

The good future of transport is shown here.

Report as: spam offensive i on 10/11/06 at 7am

"With 43,000 deaths on the road every year, countless lives could be saved "
Ummm. You just counted them :-P

Report as: spam offensive s on 10/11/06 at 5pm

awwww, that's funny (above). i'd probably write something similar.

Report as: spam offensive Arundo on 10/13/06 at 1pm

The social implications of an invention like this are enormous. Certainly, it would create a new industry assembling the modular autonomous vehicles, but hundreds of thousands, if not millions of low skilled delivery and bus driver jobs would be lost in the US alone.
And those fields are heavily unionized so these are often fairly well paying blue collar jobs.
This field is just one of many effected by the increasing feasability of autonomous components.
Ultimately, I'd say within 30 years or less, the world may have very few low skilled jobs left. You heard me right. Billions will be unemployed, forever. Any job which is scriptable will be automated.
They won't be job creation enough to employ them ever again.
Lets hope that the global governmental reaction to these irreversible and far reaching sea changes, which will occur fairly quickly, won't be war.

Report as: spam offensive Heidi on 10/16/06 at 10am

The argument that technology/computers/robots will replace people has been around a long time. 30 years ago the argument against computers was that they would put people out of a job. Sometimes they did, but people adapt. 15 years ago it was prophesied that with new object oriented coding practices computer programmers would be out of a job. I haven't seen that yet. Sometimes people are cheaper than technology (millions of illegal immigrants can testify to that). Times change, people adapt. The human potential is still largely untapped.

Report as: spam offensive urtl on 10/24/06 at 6pm

If someone successfully create a human level artificial intelligent car then it will replace all the jobs by bus,trucks,cars, even motorcycles. But it will also save lives by having a more superior driver.

Report as: spam offensive Marc Rhodes on 10/30/06 at 2am

Won't people prefer 43,000 deaths caused by other humans to even one death caused by a runaway robot car <gasp!>.

Report as: spam offensive K Brooks on 11/02/06 at 9am

Automation sometimes replaces skilled jobs too. Look at craftsmen who have been relaced by machines. Sometime automation de-skills jobs so that someone only needs to press a few keys etc. But it sometime creates more skilled jobs if wealth is created. I wish a computer could do my job then I could do something more interesting.

Report as: spam offensive P. Edwards on 2/13/07 at 10am

Okay, not to rain on the parade, for I find this topic very interesting and very cool. But with my father being a mechanic, and me taking a lot of time in the shop to work on my own racecar, I can definitely see the downside of an autonomous car such as this.

What would happen if the sensors that were supposed to detect braking and accelerating broke? Cars wouldnt' be able to communicate with each other, and that could lead to just as many accidents as there are now. Not to mention how much it would cost to replace sensors, and how much time it will take for mechanics to learn all the new things about installing them. That's probably close to millions in labor and repairs just in America.

I think that the autonomous car is an excellent idea, but everything has it's drawbacks. And until this whole thing is mastered, I'll stick with my own method; hands on the wheel.

Report as: spam offensive ML on 2/21/07 at 3pm

All I can say if these guys made a car to go by itself to a specific spot in the desert after driving through obstacles for 132 miles they will surely make one reliable enough to run in a city. Impressive.




(Comments are meant to provide a constructive way for users to interact online. Please keep discussion civil, and refrain from using profanity, personal attacks, potentially libelous language, or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the comment section of its Web site. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the board or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper support a free exchange of ideas, even if beliefs expressed are controversial, but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and sole discretion to delete or not delete any post for any reason at any time. If something is posted in the comment section of the Web site, the expressed view should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site, or they may be removed. By posting a comment, you attest that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining full responsibility for what you write.)